抖阴短视频

The United States could slash greenhouse gas emissions from power production by up to 78 percent below 1990 levels within 15 years while meeting increased demand, according to a new study by NOAA and University of Colorado Boulder researchers.

The study used a sophisticated mathematical model to evaluate future cost, demand, generation and transmission scenarios. It found that with improvements in transmission infrastructure, weather-driven renewable resources could supply most of the nation鈥檚 electricity at costs similar to today鈥檚.

鈥淥ur research shows a transition to a reliable, low-carbon, electrical generation and transmission system can be accomplished with commercially available technology and within 15 years,鈥� said Alexander MacDonald, co-lead author and recently retired director of NOAA鈥檚 Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL) in Boulder.

The 听is published online today in the journal Nature Climate Change.

Although improvements in wind and solar generation have continued to ratchet down the cost of producing renewable energy, these energy resources are inherently intermittent. As a result, utilities have invested in surplus generation capacity to back up renewable energy generation with natural gas-fired generators and other reserves.

鈥淚n the future, they may not need to,鈥� said co-lead author Christopher Clack, a physicist and mathematician with the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences at 抖阴短视频-Boulder.

Since the sun is shining or winds are blowing somewhere across the United States all of the time, MacDonald theorized that the key to resolving the dilemma of intermittent renewable generation might be to scale up the renewable energy generation system to match the scale of weather systems.

So MacDonald, who has studied weather and worked to improve forecasts for more than 40 years, assembled a team of four other NOAA scientists to explore the idea. Using NOAA鈥檚 high-resolution meteorological data, they built a model to evaluate the cost of integrating different sources of electricity into a national energy system. The model estimates renewable resource potential, energy demand, emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) and the costs of expanding and operating electricity generation and transmission systems to meet future needs.

The model allowed researchers to evaluate the affordability, reliability, and greenhouse gas emissions of various energy mixes, including coal. It showed that low-cost and low-emissions are not mutually exclusive.

鈥淭he model relentlessly seeks the lowest-cost energy, whatever constraints are applied,鈥� Clack said. 鈥淎nd it always installs more renewable energy on the grid than exists today.鈥�

Even in a scenario where renewable energy costs more than experts predict, the model produced a system that cuts CO₂ emissions 33 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, and delivered electricity at about 8.6 cents per kilowatt hour. By comparison, electricity cost 9.4 cents per kWh in 2012.

If renewable energy costs were lower and natural gas costs higher, as is expected in the future, the modeled system sliced CO₂ emissions by 78 percent from 1990 levels and delivered electricity at 10 cents per kWh. The year 1990 is a standard scientific benchmark for greenhouse gas analysis.

A scenario that included coal yielded lower cost (8.5 cents per kWh), but the highest emissions.

At the recent Paris climate summit, the United States pledged to cut greenhouse emissions from all sectors up to 28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025. The new paper suggests the United States could cut total CO₂ emissions 31 percent below 2005 levels by 2030 by making changes only within the electric sector, even though the electrical sector represents just 38 percent of the national CO₂ budget. These changes would include rapidly expanding renewable energy generation and improving transmission infrastructure.

In identifying low-cost solutions, researchers enabled the model to build and pay for transmission infrastructure improvements鈥攕pecifically a new, high-voltage direct-current transmission grid (HVDC) to supplement the current electrical grid. HVDC lines, which are in use around the world, reduce energy losses during long-distance transmission. The model did choose to use those lines extensively, and the study found that investing in efficient, long-distance transmission was key to keeping costs low.

MacDonald compared the idea of a HVDC grid with the interstate highway system which transformed the U.S. economy in the 1950s. 鈥淲ith an 鈥榠nterstate for electrons鈥�, renewable energy could be delivered anywhere in the country while emissions plummet,鈥� he said.听 鈥淎n HVDC grid would create a national electricity market in which all types of generation, including low-carbon sources, compete on a cost basis. The surprise was how dominant wind and solar could be.鈥�

The new model is drawing interest from other experts in the field.

"This study pushes the envelope,鈥� said Stanford University鈥檚 Mark Jacobson, who commented on the findings in an editorial he wrote for the journal Nature Climate Change. 鈥淚t shows that intermittent renewables plus transmission can eliminate most fossil-fuel electricity while matching power demand at lower cost than a fossil fuel-based grid - even before storage is considered."

CIRES is a partnership of NOAA and 抖阴短视频-Boulder.

Contact:
Christopher Clack, CIRES, 303-497-4296
christopher.clack@noaa.gov
Alexander MacDonald, NOAA, 303-497-6378
alexander.e.macdonald@noaa.gov
Theo Stein, NOAA Communications, 303-497-6288
theo.stein@noaa.gov
Katy Human, CIRES communications, 303-735-0196
kathleen.human@colorado.edu

Additional media:听

鈥� Wind ()

A high-resolution map based on NOAA weather data showing wind energy potential across the United States in 2012.听 Image by Chris Clack/CIRES

鈥� Solar ()

A high-resolution map based on NOAA solar irradiance data showing solar energy potential across the United States. By Chris Clack/CIRES

鈥� Wind animation ()

The wind is always blowing somewhere in the United States, though in any given location, it may stall out periodically and there are some locations with better wind resources than others. A new analysis shows that by better matching the scale of the U.S. electricity system to the scale of weather, the country could keep energy costs low, put more wind and solar on the grid, and eliminate much of the sector's greenhouse gas emissions. The study finds that combining wind and solar is important as they are complementary. This animation covers 10 days in January 2008. Visualization by Chris Clack/CIRES

鈥� Solar animation ()

Solar resources vary across the country, with greater potential in the South (and during the day). A new analysis shows that by better matching the scale of the U.S. electricity system to the scale of weather, the country could keep energy costs low, put more wind and solar on the grid, and eliminate much of the sector's greenhouse gas emissions. The study finds that combining wind and solar is important as they are complementary. This animation covers 10 days in January 2008.Visualization by Chris Clack/CIRES

鈥� Power flow animation ()

This animation shows a cost-optimized model solution that emerges from a tool that simulates possible futures of U.S. electricity system; using high-resolution weather data provided by NOAA. The model relentlessly searches for the cheapest combination of generation and transmission to satisfy the country's electricity needs. In this particular animation, blue dots represent wind energy production (the darker the blue the more power produced), red represents solar, and gray transmission lines turn black when the model sends power along them.

This animation covers seven days during the summer using historical weather from 2007. Visualization by Chris Clack/CIRES