¶¶Òõ¶ÌÊÓƵ

The disclosure statement is called the DS2 and the format is prescribed by Uniform Guidance. It discloses our cost accounting principles and how we account for our indirect and direct cost pools. It is audited to ensure consistency in accounting practices across all cost pools which are used to calculate the overhead rates.

If you would like to request a lower rate, see the IDC Waiver Policy. If you would like to include a higher rate, please work with your proposal analyst to ensure sponsor approval.

¶¶Òõ¶ÌÊÓƵ may negotiate different rates for certain contracts (e.g. DOD contracts) with the Federal Government. These rates must use the same calculation and negotiation methodology as the organized research. It’s not always optimal to calculate different rates for different activities and universities will only consider different rates if it has a positive impact on the overall indirect cost recoveries.

The 26% for the Federal government would continue to apply for off-campus research. The current rate for on-campus research is 56.5%. However, with our industry partners we can negotiate a higher rate. There are a few options to negotiate higher rates for certain circumstances. For example, the overhead for DOD contracts may warrant a higher rate.

If it's faculty in a department that is not separately budgeted and accounted for as a research project, then that will typically fall into the instruction direct cost pool. It is a direct cost, but it is an instruction direct cost. However, if you have a faculty member with a committed cost share during the semester, or they are directly charged on a research grant, the proportionate salary goes into the direct research cost pool. There will be a split between instruction and research.

PI’s are out there competing for research grants and we need to show that we are cost competitive. At the same time we need to be able to attract the research to our institution. We need to have high quality research programs, faculty, and students. Also, we need to have phenomenal facilities to do the research. All of that comes with a cost. There may be specific research that we are trying to attract and we may agree to charge a lower rate in order to bring them to campus. It is not one size fits all. Our goal is to optimize how much we recover in order to provide the world class facilities we have here at ¶¶Òõ¶ÌÊÓƵ.

There are different kinds of cost share.

• Required committed cost share: Included as part of the budget on the award, so we include it in the base, and it becomes a direct cost of research. Therefore, we charge F&A on the project.
• Voluntary committed cost share: Included as part of the budget on the award, so we include it in the base, and it becomes a direct cost of research. Therefore, we charge F&A on the project.
• Voluntary uncommitted cost share: It is not included in the budget. It stays in the instruction base. We don’t include it into research and we don’t charge F&A.

We start with information from facilities management that includes buildings, square footage and who it belongs to. However, they will not necessarily know how the space is utilized by the departments and the occupants of a specific building. CCO will contact academic and research units and send a list of all the rooms in that building, and then ask for input on how that space is utilized. We will also conduct an onsite visit to confirm the information because DHHS-CAS comes out during the negotiation process and conducts their own space surveys to back up our data.

The answer is no. When we look at categorizing our space we are looking where active research is normally done, and unless we designate a hall to be active research it is typically what they call community space i.e. restrooms, break rooms or lobbies. Typically, those cannot be counted as active research space, and therefore we cannot code the entire building as research.

Yes, there are two types of equipment. The first type is movable equipment. If it is over $5,000 and it’s capital, we try to match it to the space in which it is being utilized. Building equipment, things that are attached, we call that non-movable equipment. ¶¶Òõ¶ÌÊÓƵ allocates non-movable equipment based on the square footage in the building and how the building is being used.

Assuming the environmental chamber is not part of a recharge center (internal service center), then yes, this would be included in IDC. In other words, it would be designated in our space survey as research space and our indirect costs associated with that space would be allocated accordingly.

The Uniform Guidance defines Modified Total Direct Cost (MTDC) in 2 CFR 200, §200.68. Participant Support Costs is an exclusion of the MTDC. Prior F&A Rate Agreements omit the PSC reference in the MTDC statement section. The most current F&A Rate Agreement dated 6/28/2021 now includes Participant Support Costs as an exclusion from MTDC.

No. All the direct cost pools get an indirect cost calculation. See current F&A rates for research and instruction (LINK WHEN RESOURCE IS UP).

We use the instructional rate very infrequently on specific projects that are instructional and not research related. Examples include educational outreach programs, training, and grants for professional development.

The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) is the cognizant agency for universities that receive most of their Federal research funding through NSF and NIH. The Office of Naval Research (ONR) negotiates with universities that receive most of their Federal research funding through the Department of Defense. ¶¶Òõ¶ÌÊÓƵ Boulder receives most of our research grants and contracts from NIH and NSF, therefore DHHS is the cognizant agency for ¶¶Òõ¶ÌÊÓƵ.

Per Uniform Guidance, where the total direct cost of work covered by an institution does not exceed ten million in a fiscal year, the simplified procedure may be used in determining allowable indirect (F&A) costs. ¶¶Òõ¶ÌÊÓƵ does exceed ten million in a fiscal year, so we are not eligible to use the simplified procedure.

Any additional narrative that we think would help our negotiation should be introduced at the time of negotiation.

The cost is absorbed through other funding sources in the University. This subsidy may be considered an investment in our research enterprise. While we try to recover most of our costs, we know continuing investment in our research support is important to the ¶¶Òõ¶ÌÊÓƵ mission.

Allowability is prescribed by the federal government in the Uniform Guidance and is typically not negotiable for federal projects. Some expenses may be approved for other sponsors. There are situations where an allowable cost is the subject of a research project, for example alcohol, and would be allowed on the project. See a list of typical allowable vs unallowable expenses.

The DAICR is calculated and distributed per policy: DA-ICR Policy Statement 2009.